March 19, 2012 By Bruce Judson, New Deal 2.0 New evidence points to illegal behavior. Prosecution is the only way to keep that behavior from continuing. It’s now a near certainty that Wall Street executives committed felonies. The recently released audits of robo-mortgage activities by the  Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban  Development (HUD) details shocking behavior at the five banks  constituting the Federal Housing Administration’s largest mortgage  servicers. At Wells Fargo, management quashed a midlevel manager’s study of the  foreclosure process as negative results began to emerge, and it gave an  individual whose last job had been in a pizza restaurant the title of  “vice-president of loan documentation to facilitate robo-mortgage  signing. Bank of America evaluated employees on the volume of foreclosure affidavits produced. JP Morgan Chase gave individuals titles such as “vice-president of  Chase Home” where “the titles were given by Chase for the sole purpose  of allowing individuals to sign documents and came with no other duties  or authority.” Citigroup and Ally similarly engaged in seemingly illegal  practices. Under federal law, the knowing filing of a false affidavit with the  court is a felony offense of perjury, punishable by a prison term of up  to five years. An individual violates laws against perjury whether he or  she personally appears in court and swears to a false statement or  provides the court with a false affidavit. Individual states have their  own perjury laws, which were undoubtedly violated as well. The HUD report also suggests that individual banks may be guilty of  obstruction of justice and the criminal violation of the False Claims  Act for filing insurance claims without following HUD requirements. Since the start of the financial crisis, federal and state officials  have been struggling to change Wall Street behavior. To date, every  effort has failed miserably, and the weak enforcement provisions of the  robo-mortgage settlement are unlikely to meaningfully change this  dynamic. Government officials have also relied, with a very few  exceptions, entirely on civil enforcement when criminal laws appear to  have been egregiously violated. The greatest moral hazard now confronting the nation is what appears  to be increasingly brazen criminal activity by financial industry  executives. With each decision not to prosecute, Wall Street executives  justifiably conclude that they are immune to the rules. As a result, it  appears that Wall Street criminal activity is increasing in frequency  and severity, as opposed to the reverse. The activities surrounding the collapse of MF Global are one example. So what can be done about it? We can change the behavior in the  financial service industry for a full generation in just seven days. This plan may seem to be tongue and cheek, but it hearkens back to a  similar action in the era of the Great Depression. In the final months  of Herbert Hoover’s presidency, the Senate Banking Committee began an  investigation into the causes of the Great Crash of 1929, and a young  prosecutor named Ferdinand Pecora was appointed as Chief Counsel. Subsequently, the Roosevelt administration conveyed to Pecora that  “the prosecution of an outstanding violator of the banking law would be  the most salutary action that could be taken at this time. The feeling  is that if the people become convinced that the big violators are to be  punished, it will be helpful in restoring confidence.” Ultimately, this investigation, which came to be known as the Pecora  Commission, led to the indictment of one of America’s most prominent  financiers; demonstrated widespread self-dealing in the financial  sector; and, as noted by historian Alan Brinkley, generated “broad  popular support” for Roosevelt’s reform agenda, including the creation  of the SEC and the Glass-Steagall Act. Buy a copy of The Unfinished Revolution: Voices from the Global Fight  for Women’s Rights, featuring a chapter by Roosevelt Institute Senior  Fellow Ellen Chesler. My seven day plan is based on a simple premise: When criminal laws  are egregiously violated, the guilty parties should face appropriate  punishment. Here’s the plan: Day One: Read the HUD Inspector General’s reports and the public  records of past mortgage foreclosure cases from across the nation. Day Two: Meet with the team at the Office of the Inspector General at  HUD that prepared the audits. Obtain the names of all the bank  officials, lawyers, and notaries whose behavior, as cited in the audit  reports or otherwise known to the investigators, represent clear and  unquestionable criminal violations. Add to this list other individuals  who have similarly demonstrated or testified to behavior unquestionably  constituting criminal acts, as indicated by the public records of the  mortgage foreclosure cases reviewed in day one. Day Three: Indict all of the individuals on the list compiled on day two. Day Four: Indict banks and financial institutions on criminal charges  where criminal behavior by employees (as demonstrated by day three  indictments) appears to be endemic. The Justice Department guidelines  for prosecuting firms include: (1) the pervasiveness of such activity,  (2) the compliance procedures in place, (3) attempts by the corporation  to end bad behavior, and (4) cooperation with federal investigators. In  2008, the Justice Department adopted a policy of accepting “deferred  prosecutions,” involving agreements to change corporate behavior without  damaging innocent third parties through prosecution. Corporations receive the benefits of “legal persons,” as demonstrated  by Citizens United. But they must also bear the responsibilities of  these privileges. A reading of the HUD reports, and other public  records, suggests several banks should clearly be prosecuted. Day 5: Discuss plea bargains with indicted lower-level officials in  return for cooperating in investigations of higher-level officials. Day 6: Consider plea bargains with indicted banks, which require the  removal of all remaining officers and directors who were serving when  egregious criminal activity occurred, as well as senior officials who  were in a position to exercise appropriate supervisory responsibility  but chose to look the other way. Day 7: Indict any senior Wall Street officials implicated by new  cooperative testimony resulting from activities on day five. Adopt and  announce a policy that future criminal violations will be prosecuted in a  similar fashion. What is particularly disturbing is that a look at the evidence  already in the public domain (much less what investigators already know)  shows that none of the actions discussed above are entirely absurd. The  purpose of prosecution not simply punishment. It acts to deter further  illegal activity and to restore public confidence in our system of  governance. The nation desperately needs both of these benefits today. Moreover, these ongoing, almost certainly criminal activities are  ultimately dangerous threats to our economy, the success of capitalism,  and our democracy. In his column on MF Global, Joe Nocera noted that  “customers need to be able to trust” the laws protecting their money.  “Otherwise, the markets can’t function.” Today, as in the era of FDR, we must send a message to the financial  community that illegal behavior will not be tolerated. By prosecuting  blatant felonies now, we will deter future misbehavior and begin the  process of recreating a fair society where equal justice prevails. Bruce Judson is Entrepreneur-in-Residence at the Yale  Entrepreneurial Institute and a former Senior Faculty Fellow at the Yale  School of Management.A Seven Day Plan to Finally Hold Wall Street Accountable 
A Seven Day Plan to Finally Hold Wall Street Accountable
A Seven Day Plan to Finally Hold Wall Street Accountable
The Gathering Spot is a PEERS empowerment website
"Dedicated to the greatest good of all who share our beautiful world"

It's a simple solution. Too bad it's based on the presumption that the American Justice System is interested in justice. Maybe if we could find a handful of honest judges, we might give it try.