Food, ad industries resist federal guidelines for marketing to children

http://bangordailynews.com/2011/05/25/health/food-ad-industries-resist-f...

Food, ad industries resist federal guidelines for marketing to children

Posted May 25, 2011, at 12:12 p.m.

Associated Press photo by Paul Sakuma

WASHINGTON – The food and advertising industries are pushing back against an Obama administration proposal that calls for food makers to voluntarily limit the way they market sugary cereals, salty snacks and other foods to children and teens.

From yogurt makers to candy manufacturers, they lined up Tuesday to tell regulators that the first-ever proposed guidelines for marketing to children would not stop the childhood obesity problem but would certainly hurt their businesses and abridge their right to free speech.

The guidelines, ordered by Congress and written by a team from the Federal Trade Commission, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Agriculture Department, ignited a debate about the role of marketing in soaring obesity rates among children.

“I can’t imagine any mom in America who thinks stripping tigers and toucans off cereal boxes will do anything to reduce obesity,” said Scott Faber, a vice president at the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents food makers and retailers.

But public interest groups and health experts say tighter controls on advertising will make a difference.

“It’s clear that food marketing to children is a big factor,” said Daniel Levy of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

“Children and teens are being hit by food ads wherever they turn,” said Levy, adding that teen-agers can now receive promotional messages about marketing deals on their cell phones as they pass fast-food restaurants.

The regulators held Tuesday’s meeting to gather input from the public. They are accepting written comments until July 14 before finalizing the recommendations and submitting them in a report to Congress.

The far-reaching guidelines would cover a wide array of marketing, from traditional media such as television, print and radio to pop-up ads on Internet sites. They would apply to social media, toys in fast-food meals, ads shown in movie theaters , sponsorship of athletic teams and philanthropic activities, as well as product placement in movies and video games.

“Marketing campaigns are highly integrated, very sophisticated with the result that marketing messages are ubiquitous,” said Michelle Rusk, an attorney at the Federal Trade Commission. “TV and traditional media are only about half of the marketing to children, maybe even less.”

The guidelines would be voluntary and implemented over a decade. But food companies and advertising firms say they would feel great pressure to follow guidelines, making them de facto regulations.

“This is a classic case of backdoor regulation,” said Dan Jaffe of the Association of National Advertisers.

Advertising aimed at children is a big business; food companies spend about $2 billion a year to advertise to children.

Regulators say they hope the guidelines will nudge manufacturers to improve the nutritional content of processed foods aimed at children and teens.

“We don’t want them to just quit marketing to children but to lower the sugar content or include more whole grains and then market these better options to children,” Rusk said.

Food makers repeatedly said that they were already policing themselves and no additional measures were necessary. Since 2006, 17 food and beverage companies have participated in an industry program to restrict some marketing aimed at children. But that program lacks uniform standards, allowing each participating company to set its own criteria.

“Self-regulation shows hints of progress, but it’s not working well enough to protect our children,” said Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which supports the proposed federal guidelines along with several major public health organizations.

The guidelines say foods that are advertised to children cannot exceed limited amounts of added sugars, saturated fat, sodium or trans fat. And they must include healthy ingredients, such as fruit and vegetables, low-fat dairy products or whole grains.

The sugar limits would pose a problem for many foods currently marketed to children. Under the guidelines, one serving of a food aimed at children could not exceed 8 grams of sugar. A single serving of Count Chocula cereal currently contains 12 grams of sugar; a serving of Frosted Flakes contains 11 grams.

The guidelines would apply to both young children and teenagers. Food makers and advertisers argue the guidelines should be more narrowly tailored when applied to teen-agers because much of the programming and media consumed by teen-agers are also seen by adults.

Federal regulators say they will take that notion into consideration in the final recommendations.

 

Noa's picture

Unfortunately, many parents (myself included) are likely to buy what their children will eat over healthier choices. If I could do it over, I probably would make less compromises with the kiddies.  (Although, in my defense, I did resist one of the biggest ploys... the Happy Meal toy and styrofood at McDonalds.)

It's a sad reality that most kids want to dress, act, and eat like their peers.  I did my best to pack them a healthy lunch in a modern lunch box, but they opted to buy the crappy cafeteria food at school instead, so they could 'fit in'.

So why do kids make the choices they do?  I think it comes back to market conditioning.  It's no accident and should certainly be no surprise to advertisers.

I've always wondered how American families with hectic modern lives are expected to get their "5 a day" fruits & veg when fast food and even kid's menu food at sit-down restaurants is usually meat+starch-veg.  Most people I know consider taste before nutrition.

Overall, my kids ate healthier than most of their peers, but only because I read labels and understand the food game.  I was able to cook most of our meals from scratch.  When I didn't have time, we opted for Subway sandwiches over burgers.  I avoided buying soda and kid's cereal with sugar content above 10 grams.  (I remember Captain Crunch having 20 grams of sugar!)  I don't think my kids appreciated my efforts, then or now that they're adults.  I can only hope that their overall health is better than if I hadn't censored the junk food.

In the end, food is only one in a long list of toxins aimed our way.  Maybe the best any of us can do is damage control.

Healthy Eating is Possible and completely within the range of normal and cool.  But 10 years ago it was not... I remember having to argue with my son's doctor  as to the merits of a chemical free diet and organic diet and how drugs are not the answer.  I was considered a nut job!

Now, 10 years later, it is the norm to eat healthy!  It is cool and hip and in! 

My kids opt for fresh fruit and veggies always.  They literally will munch and crunch themselves through 12 pounds each of fruit and veggies.  It is a challenge to meet these food needs for  3 kiddos on a very limited budget.  We have found a way.  A local food bank gives away bread on a first come/first serve basis  so what I would spend on bread I put toward the fresh fruit and veggies.

carrots, celery, cucumbers, apples, bananas, strawberries, watermelon, and pears (and when Florida Oranges are in season those too) as well as lemons are the least expensive for us... so that is what we are eating a lot of.  They live off of the reduced produce cart...

When the fruit is too bruised and overripe for socially acceptable eating I make smoothies and send that to school in a cool thermos.  My son seems to be a trend setter...

As for junk food... all my kids dislike the taste of conventional snack food.  They tell me it tastes yucky and will not eat it.  They do love blue corn chips which are non GMO... and all of them read the labels.

I agree the best we can do is minimize the exposure.  Education goes a long way to doing this.  I am just happy to see that there are lawmakers that are trying to make good on their promises.

To me this represents progress from 10 years ago.

I bless you with Love--

Fairy

Wendy's picture

Hi Fairy-

I think it is great that your kids are eating healthy. I think that with committed parenting, kids learn to eat right. Although I'm hugely sadened that the food companies are willing to take advantage of young minds to further their profits, I think if parents were really committed to teaching their children not to trust advertising, all the money spent on advertising would have little effect. I can envision a world where this gradually happens and advertising goes away on it's own as it no longer becomes profitable.

Wendy

We do not watch TV.  That is the other piece that I did not add.  Since we eat a lot of wild gathered foods and they go with me a'gathering when I say something is 'poision and yucky' they listen.  The same goes for when we are at the store a'gathering our purchases and when they are at a friend's house a'gathering food stuffs.  How they know it tastes yucky is they have tried it and not liked the chemical foods.  It is simple.  Creating relationships based upon leadership and trust and full happy tummies.

Fairy

 

The Gathering Spot is a PEERS empowerment website
"Dedicated to the greatest good of all who share our beautiful world"